The Cage Index@TheCageIndex

CI 100 • September 14, 2026

#94

Steve Garcia

Featherweight

CAGE INDEX RATING71.49CIR v2.8

This page reports Steve Garcia’s published Cage Index standing for the current snapshot. CIR is a model rating of recorded UFC results, not a fight prediction or an official UFC ranking.

Steve Garcia

Ranking résumé

THE NUMBER IN CONTEXT

Current standing, division position and historical highs from the same CIR v2.8 archive used by the Historical Calculator.

Current P4P#94CIR 71.49
Division rank#11Featherweight • 85 qualified
Peak CIR81.21Nov 2, 2025
Career-best P4P#33Nov 2, 2025
CI 100 event weeks87Qualified event-week snapshots
Top-10 event weeks0Qualified event-week snapshots
Gap above0.12 CIR to #93 Bo Nickal
Gap below0.02 CIR over #95 Valter Walker

Latest event impact

WHY THEY MOVED

Noche UFC: Silva vs Delgado • Sep 13, 2026Fell 1 place to #94CIR 71.50 → 71.49 (-0.01)

Steve Garcia did not compete on this card. Across the Sep 11, 2026 → Sep 13, 2026 recalculation, CIR moved 71.50 → 71.49 (-0.01). Any rank movement came from field-wide results, normal time decay and eligibility changes rather than a new bout for Steve Garcia.

See the full event impact →

Card movement uses CIR v2.8 snapshots at 2026-09-11 and 2026-09-13. A rank can change because the fighter changes, other fighters change, eligibility changes, or evidence ages with time.

Historical CIR

CAREER RATING TIMELINE

Every qualified historical snapshot in the CIR v2.8 archive, from Oct 10, 2021 through Sep 14, 2026.

9076634935Peak CIR 81.21 on Nov 2, 2025Latest CIR 71.49 on Sep 14, 2026202120242026
Peak: 81.21 • Nov 2, 2025Best rank: #33 • Nov 2, 2025Current: 71.49 • #94

This chart is descriptive historical output, not a prediction. Inactivity can lower CIR through time decay even without a new loss.

How to read this number

Opponent-relative fight evidence drives ability; reliability changes the weight of that evidence; recency ages it; and bounded, division-specific championship support combines with ability. Those context displays are not separate additive bonuses.

See the CIR methodology →