The Cage Index@TheCageIndex

CI 100 • September 14, 2026

#38

Sean Brady

Welterweight

CAGE INDEX RATING80.26CIR v2.8

This page reports Sean Brady’s published Cage Index standing for the current snapshot. CIR is a model rating of recorded UFC results, not a fight prediction or an official UFC ranking.

Sean Brady

Ranking résumé

THE NUMBER IN CONTEXT

Current standing, division position and historical highs from the same CIR v2.8 archive used by the Historical Calculator.

Current P4P#38CIR 80.26
Division rank#5Welterweight • 71 qualified
Peak CIR84.36Mar 23, 2025
Career-best P4P#18Mar 23, 2025
CI 100 event weeks260Qualified event-week snapshots
Top-10 event weeks0Qualified event-week snapshots
Gap above0.31 CIR to #37 Arman Tsarukyan
Gap below0.32 CIR over #39 Manel Kape

Latest event impact

WHY THEY MOVED

Noche UFC: Silva vs Delgado • Sep 13, 2026Fell 1 place to #38CIR 80.28 → 80.27 (-0.01)

Sean Brady did not compete on this card. Across the Sep 11, 2026 → Sep 13, 2026 recalculation, CIR moved 80.28 → 80.27 (-0.01). Any rank movement came from field-wide results, normal time decay and eligibility changes rather than a new bout for Sean Brady.

See the full event impact →

Card movement uses CIR v2.8 snapshots at 2026-09-11 and 2026-09-13. A rank can change because the fighter changes, other fighters change, eligibility changes, or evidence ages with time.

Historical CIR

CAREER RATING TIMELINE

Every qualified historical snapshot in the CIR v2.8 archive, from Mar 1, 2020 through Sep 14, 2026.

9083756860Peak CIR 84.36 on Mar 23, 2025Latest CIR 80.26 on Sep 14, 2026202020232026
Peak: 84.36 • Mar 23, 2025Best rank: #18 • Mar 23, 2025Current: 80.26 • #38

This chart is descriptive historical output, not a prediction. Inactivity can lower CIR through time decay even without a new loss.

How to read this number

Opponent-relative fight evidence drives ability; reliability changes the weight of that evidence; recency ages it; and bounded, division-specific championship support combines with ability. Those context displays are not separate additive bonuses.

See the CIR methodology →