The Cage Index@TheCageIndex

CI 100 • September 14, 2026

#43

Jean Silva

Featherweight

CAGE INDEX RATING79.60CIR v2.8

This page reports Jean Silva’s published Cage Index standing for the current snapshot. CIR is a model rating of recorded UFC results, not a fight prediction or an official UFC ranking.

Jean Silva

Ranking résumé

THE NUMBER IN CONTEXT

Current standing, division position and historical highs from the same CIR v2.8 archive used by the Historical Calculator.

Current P4P#43CIR 79.60
Division rank#5Featherweight • 85 qualified
Peak CIR79.61Sep 13, 2026
Career-best P4P#43Sep 13, 2026
CI 100 event weeks80Qualified event-week snapshots
Top-10 event weeks0Qualified event-week snapshots
Gap above0.06 CIR to #42 Farid Basharat
Gap below0.01 CIR over #44 Sergei Pavlovich

Latest event impact

WHY THEY MOVED

Noche UFC: Silva vs Delgado • Sep 13, 2026Rose 21 places to #43CIR 75.07 → 79.61 (+4.53)

Jean Silva did not compete on this card. Across the Sep 11, 2026 → Sep 13, 2026 recalculation, CIR moved 75.07 → 79.61 (+4.53). Any rank movement came from field-wide results, normal time decay and eligibility changes rather than a new bout for Jean Silva.

See the full event impact →

Card movement uses CIR v2.8 snapshots at 2026-09-11 and 2026-09-13. A rank can change because the fighter changes, other fighters change, eligibility changes, or evidence ages with time.

Historical CIR

CAREER RATING TIMELINE

Every qualified historical snapshot in the CIR v2.8 archive, from Jun 30, 2024 through Sep 14, 2026.

8579736660Peak CIR 79.61 on Sep 13, 2026Latest CIR 79.60 on Sep 14, 2026202420252026
Peak: 79.61 • Sep 13, 2026Best rank: #43 • Sep 13, 2026Current: 79.60 • #43

This chart is descriptive historical output, not a prediction. Inactivity can lower CIR through time decay even without a new loss.

How to read this number

Opponent-relative fight evidence drives ability; reliability changes the weight of that evidence; recency ages it; and bounded, division-specific championship support combines with ability. Those context displays are not separate additive bonuses.

See the CIR methodology →