The Cage Index@TheCageIndex

CI 100 • September 14, 2026

#35

Alexa Grasso

Women's Flyweight

CAGE INDEX RATING80.92CIR v2.8

This page reports Alexa Grasso’s published Cage Index standing for the current snapshot. CIR is a model rating of recorded UFC results, not a fight prediction or an official UFC ranking.

Alexa Grasso

Ranking résumé

THE NUMBER IN CONTEXT

Current standing, division position and historical highs from the same CIR v2.8 archive used by the Historical Calculator.

Current P4P#35CIR 80.92
Division rank#5Women's Flyweight • 35 qualified
Peak CIR83.76Mar 5, 2023
Career-best P4P#16Mar 5, 2023
CI 100 event weeks133Qualified event-week snapshots
Top-10 event weeks0Qualified event-week snapshots
Gap above0.20 CIR to #34 Erin Blanchfield
Gap below0.04 CIR over #36 Song Yadong

Latest event impact

WHY THEY MOVED

Noche UFC: Silva vs Delgado • Sep 13, 2026Rose 44 places to #35CIR 73.36 → 80.93 (+7.57)

Recorded result: Alexa Grasso wins · Unanimous decision · R3 5:00. Across the Sep 11, 2026 → Sep 13, 2026 recalculation, CIR moved 73.36 → 80.93 (+7.57). Rank movement also reflects simultaneous changes elsewhere in the qualified field.

See the full event impact →

Card movement uses CIR v2.8 snapshots at 2026-09-11 and 2026-09-13. A rank can change because the fighter changes, other fighters change, eligibility changes, or evidence ages with time.

Historical CIR

CAREER RATING TIMELINE

Every qualified historical snapshot in the CIR v2.8 archive, from Feb 5, 2017 through Sep 14, 2026.

9076634935Peak CIR 83.76 on Mar 5, 2023Latest CIR 80.92 on Sep 14, 2026201720222026
Peak: 83.76 • Mar 5, 2023Best rank: #16 • Mar 5, 2023Current: 80.92 • #35

This chart is descriptive historical output, not a prediction. Inactivity can lower CIR through time decay even without a new loss.

How to read this number

Opponent-relative fight evidence drives ability; reliability changes the weight of that evidence; recency ages it; and bounded, division-specific championship support combines with ability. Those context displays are not separate additive bonuses.

See the CIR methodology →